I agree you shouldn’t engage in debate with delusions peddled by Rush and Fox. You have your own delusions more closely detailed to your prejudices and anger peddled by MSNBC and Mother Jones.
"Adding my voice to Tam's; why do I suspect that it would be easier to get satisfaction out of overstepping private security than it will out of armed 'public servants?'"I wish that were true, but given the precedent of providing immunity to contractors in Iraq, any security service with an iota of sense will want that protection included in a contract for bodyscanning American travelers.
Commenti
alecuriosa:Hey Bienvenido!!! ... No comento mucho pero soy asidua lectora .. y la semana pasada no pude felicitarlo, pero también bienvenido al Caminante!!Espero tengan muchos posts que regalarnos y no se espanten con todos los debates que un post puede ocasionar ... xD!!!
Thanks for writing such an easy-to-understand article on this topic.
I don't even know what to say, this made things so much easier!
That's a mold-breaker. Great thinking!
I agree you shouldn’t engage in debate with delusions peddled by Rush and Fox. You have your own delusions more closely detailed to your prejudices and anger peddled by MSNBC and Mother Jones.
Heck of a job there, it absolutely helps me out.
Damn, I wish I could think of something smart like that!
Hey, killer job on that one you guys!
That really captures the spirit of it. Thanks for posting.
"Adding my voice to Tam's; why do I suspect that it would be easier to get satisfaction out of overstepping private security than it will out of armed 'public servants?'"I wish that were true, but given the precedent of providing immunity to contractors in Iraq, any security service with an iota of sense will want that protection included in a contract for bodyscanning American travelers.